Can We Honestly Judge the Judge?

President Obama nominated federal Appeals Court Judge, Sonia Sotomayor, to the U.S. Supreme Court, citing her “inspiring life story” and “distinguished career” in his decision.   Judge Sotomayor, 54, is now confirmed as the first Hispanic on the high court.  Congratulations to her. However, her ethnicity or anything else seems to me to be beside the point.

Whether we personally think she is right for the job or not, clearly this woman seems to know her stuff:  In 1997 Bill Clinton nominated Sonia Sotomayor for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  George H. W. Bush nominated her as a federal judge in 1991, a position that made Sotomayor the youngest judge in the Southern District of New York.

In the long and drawn out senate hearings, it seems like most of the controversy as to whether Judge Sotomayor was fit for the position was due to the fact that during a speech at the University of California at Berkeley, she said:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

Think about it: We tell ourselves not to judge, yet evaluation is a basic survival process.

To think that we can see things without the influence of our experience is nothing more than a ‘new age’ fantasy.

However, we can choose to evaluate each given moment on an individual basis.  Nonetheless, what we choose to see or do will be judged by others, (especially those who claim to be nonjudgmental) as judgmental.

To be clear:  I understand that the law is the law. I get that, or at least I would, if it were true… We are all aware of the high-powered individuals who have walked away from prosecution with little more than a slap on the wrist in comparison to the man or woman on the street who would have, for the same crime, ended up bunking with hardcore criminals.

Again, I understand that the senate wants to make sure a high court judge is without biasHowever, that is not and cannot be possible.

You see, we human beings, no matter how educated and objective we like to think we are, have a mind that records everything we experience. We have whatever experiences we have, and the ‘ego-mind’ then creates a set of filters, (beliefs) based on that experience and all too often the ego-mind will then distort all incoming information so that you see life as a reflection of that belief.

What I’m saying here is that yes, even judges ‘judge’ based on their experience, and although they must be guided and directed by the law, to expect even a high court judge to create a ‘personal experiential amnesia’ is ludicrous.  No mater what her ethnicity or life experience…  I’m not here to judge the judge, although I know I am like all the rest of us…judgmental.

If you want to understand more of how the ego-mind is filtering and possibly limiting your reality, you can get a hold of my new book: “Don’t Read This…Your Ego Won’t Like It” at http://www.dovbaron.com/product

I look forward to your comments and feedback.

Until next time, live with courage, Dov…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: 4% [?]

  • Sandra
    Don't watch TV, news . Trying to follow what allmost all the spiritual guides advises , but since I got this email I follow the news, and was most surprise (after I google the name Sonia Sotomayor) and found out that she was a Puerto Rican, well it made me proud that a Puerto Rican made it this far...Good for her!!!...It also had me thinking that she really is focusing on what she wants....law of attaction must really work!!! You can do, be or have anything you want if you learn to guide your thoughts...Thank you so very much!!!
  • Shaun
    Yeah, we can have our ideals to aim for in life and even listen to another persons ideals or a societal ideals however perfection is a concept.

    It is not a reality of experience so it is fantasy land to *expect* perfection. It gives us something to aim for and guides us and that is the value is having ideals in what we can become for reaching deeper in ourself to live up to what is possible and we are capable of

    I certainy don't get upset if I'm not perfect or someone else is not perfect. If I am giving my best and being genuine or someone else or a team is giving the same then celebrate how much we are doing well in the direction of our ideal.
    That is what really matters.

    It is only if there is deception and misrepresentation of someone or some entities ideals that I feel genuinely pissed off an angry. I suspect I am going to get judgmental in those times and let my ego get the better of me but hey, I'm human so I understand enough of being human not to expect perfection
    even in my possible reaction or hopefully considered response if one is felt necessessary.

    Even this very blog post I can see is filtered by my experiences that I got certain beliefs based on past experiences of feeling mislead to what a persons real ideals were and finding out those ideals were quite misleading to how they really be when situations and circumstances test the genuiness of those supposed ideals.

    Now I take much more notice of what people do and act on rather than what they say or portray as their ideals or intentions. The same applies to governments , companies and organisations. I've learnt sometimes you got to remind entities of their ideals and see if they really mean anything of substance. The same goes for myself in reminding myself of my own ideals I strive for and have to guide me on what is important in way I wish to be in this world.
  • Carole Percifield
    Thanks for this Great post. I found myself judging those senators judging her. I found myself judging them to be narrow minded, bigots. Goes to show we can't help ourselves. Your post helped me step back a bit - but I still think of them as idiots as they did not address her qualifications, only her past speeches - as I said - just can't help myself.

    Thanks for your view as it did make me think. Maybe we needed to see another side of it all.
  • George Harris
    Like Lama Jimpa, and considering that I live in a different country, I also have to rely on my initial impressions of this lady. Only time will demonstrate her qualities. Not having met her personally, I can't comment from such a contact. I agree that our "filters" get in the way of any judgement. Perhaps a choice by computer is the final answer to the problem of selecting these people for these important positions. You may see the problem immediately; the computer is an invention of man, and the data used in the selction needs to be inputted by man (or woman). Do we follow the Athenian process of placing marbles in a barrel, or pieces of paper in box? We have to make a choice and hope it is the right one and is informed by some "higher self".

    Regards
    George Harris
  • Dov Baron
    Hey George,
    Thanks for your input. As you seem to have figured out no mater what process we use we are in someway always involved. As quantum physics points out; "There is no independent observer". We are always influencing everything we interact with if only at the level of perception.

    In an early post about "The Michael Jackson No One Knew" I shared a story about a friend of mine and how we were out one day and were seen together by someone who later seemed to feel it was his duty to fill me in on all my friends faults. I quickly interrupted him and said: “That’s not my experience of Joe and your experience is your own. I will not judge someone by any other experience than the one I have with them.”

    We are all forming opinions and as I said in that article opinions are like noses, almost everyone has one, but it doesn't make it 'special'.

    With gratitude, Dov...
  • Jimpa
    Hello Dov,
    Just finished your book, "Don't Read This." This is a very excellent explanation of ego mechanics. Five Stars. I highly recommend it.
    There is another aspect of judgement "Expectations." These often grand illusions cloud our perspective of others and of the world. It seems sometimes beliefs arise from expectations and sometimes expectations arise from beliefs.
    We have expectations of Supreme Court Judges, so the judgement of Judge Sotomayor is wether or not we believe she meets the criteria of our expectations. So to know if we are judging her fairly we must look at our expectaions to see if our beliefs are rational. Then the fun starts, when we look at our expectations we find that they are often the product of someone elses beliefs. Our ego mouse is now trapped in the maze. Expectaions-beliefs-judgements-beliefs-expectations and so forth.
    I expect Judge Sotomayor to uphold the laws of the land and to do it justly.
    The only belief I have is that the future will decide if she does or not. Except for the talking heads, newspaper articles, a few radio commentaries and a few pictures of her I have no basis upon which to make any judgement of Judge Sotomayer. A point of intrest, I keep looking at her picture to assess her qualities.
    So Dov I would be intrested in your thoughts about "Expectaions." What part they play in our judgements.

    Many Blessings,
    Lama Jimpa

    P.S. Thank you for the book, I'm starting the second read.
  • Dov Baron
    Hey Jimpa,
    As always great input.
    As regards expectations: Well there's a whole section in the book on beliefs, maps and filters and they all generate our expectations.

    With gratitude, Dov...
  • Wes
    Have you noticed (when we bring up world events or politics for judging) that almost all spiritualists and Law of Attraction coaches hate George Bush and the "Republicans", and still blame him for whatever is wrong now? Perhaps it makes them feel like more a part of "the savior", Obama....

    The irony of course is that they insist that they are not judgemental, and they are the most judgemental of them all.

    I appreciate your no non-sense style Dov!

    It is tough as individuals to take personal responsibility for the manifestations that we disagree with... and our ego-mind is pretty slick at hiding our insecurities.

    No offense G.W. Bush haters. ;-) Don't judge me so negatively, I am a Libertarian.... ha ha.... Or is that my opinion base?
  • Dov Baron
    Hey Wes,

    Yes the ego-mind is slick and as I've said throughout my book and here in previous articles: The ego-mind loves looking for perfection, it does this for the purpose of delaying or just avoiding. When you are uptight and freaked-out about getting ‘it’ absolutely perfect, that’s your ego-mind fully in its glory. Your job is to notice that your ego-mind is noticing these things and then quickly move on. As you can imagine when it's not busy making sure you are perfect anyone and everyone else will do.
  • Hi Dov,
    To have a judgment to me means to say that something is right or wrong, good or bad. Observation on the other hand is noticing the same thing without an emphasis on judging it. It just is.

    As far as I can see federal Appeals Court Judge, Sonia Sotomayor, made an
    observation and then declared what she observed. It is impossible not to notice what is going on in our lives or in the world. To do so would be like an ostrich that hides it's head in the sand (even thought we know that's not really true)

    Regardless of the fact that Sonia Sotomayor is a judge she has the right to make an observation and say what she observes. Those that say what she "should or shouldn't" have said are the ones who are judging, because should or shouldn't s usually come from right or wrong good or bad. Think about it.

    Thanks for your input Dov
  • Right ON Dov! You have a way of making the complex seem very simple. I say "seem" because as Kim said above, once she got it, she started "judging herself, for judging others" ;-). Our minds are judging, assessing machines! Thanks for your wisdom in guiding us to a space of higher energy and vibration.
  • Dov Baron
    Thank you Michelle and Kim,

    I am delighted that what I do works for you!
    I know that I am not particularly politically correct, I say things that are sometimes a little direct for some.
    Nonetheless, my message is clear: The only difference between me and anyone else is they may have found beauty where I can still only see that which I find repulsive. And maybe it works the other way around, maybe they cannot not yet see beauty where I presently can?

    We are all one. Take off the skin of any human and look at the brain, the heart or any other organ and you will not see a difference. The only differences are the one's we judge to be there. And when the ego-minds judgments arrive, like the Buddhists (and Kim) say, label the judgment by none judgmentally saying to yourself: "judgment, Judgment" and move along.

    As I said in an article titled: "When Pigs Fly Carry a Big Umbrella": Only through an opening of the mind can we enter into the vast expanse that is the open heart.


    With gratitude,
    Dov...
  • KEVIN ROSS
    Hi Dov
    Just like you said when you said in your first cd THE EQUATION FOR MANSIFESTATION Cd when you was little when you Mother was crying for Martin Luther King fought for civil rights Like you told your guests WE ARE ALL THE SAME
    It does not matter if we Black white Jewish Like Ms Sotomayor who went to Havard U work hard to be in the US highest Court My Goverment Bringing up her past trying to take her self worth just like you said in the EFM 1Cd But she fought back with confedence With Good pain making it important then going down the path of Regret Taking her dream away from her Now just you said Sonia can Give to Soceity Thank you Dov that why we are here for to make or dream a reality THANK DOV
  • Lynda
    Of course, we are judgemental. Academics--especially in history--begin their discourse with a "subject position" which includes the particulars of the person delivering the material.

    In fact, we like being judgemental. We get a lot from the one up position, or if we've turned negative judgement on ourselves, we get something from self-abuse.

    An even more illustrative case than the fuss over the judicial appointment and the "wise Latina" comment, is the recent Obama, Gates, Crowly incident. Because of Dov's coaching, I couldn't help but see the issues from every side--each party filtering the events based on FEAR (False Evidence Appearing Real). Obama, admitting he did not know the facts, nevertheless judged that the white police officer must have "behaved stupidly." Gates, described the hair on his neck rising as he filtered this incident through his expert knowledge of every case of a black man so arrested and chose extreme (even if righteous) anger as his response. Crowly, going by the book and doing his job according to procedure, didn't appreciate the abuse from Gates and possibly over-reacted when he decided to arrest him. This little triangle is something that happens every day in every one of our lives with or without the issue of race. We ususally don't see it from the others' side and only act from our own. It will be interesting to see what will come of the beer diplomacy. Too bad Dov wasn't there to sort it out.

    I like Kim's approach of labelling her thought as "judgement" when it happens. As soon as you do that, you open up the possibility to being wrong and accepting other positions. I'm going to use that. Thanks!
  • Kim
    Great post Dov! I used to think I was fairly non judgemental until I started to clear away the crap. And now, the more clearly I can see, the more I realize how judgemental I am. When I first realized that I started to judge myself for judging others until I realized that didn't make any sense and certainly didn't cause me to feel empowered. Now, when I notice myself making a judgement, I silently say "judgement" and that seems to release it, both against myself and the other person.

    THANKS DOV for the words of wisdom!
blog comments powered by Disqus